Central African Republic Christians Now Retaliate Against Muslim Murderers

For years, muslims have been killing non-muslims in the Central African Republic (and elsewhere) and now, like the Buddhists in Myanmar, they have had enough and are fighting back. This is excellent news and needs to be replicated elsewhere:

Read the article here: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/14/muslim-convoy-central-african-republic-exodus?CMP=ema_632

Dark Horse

National Anti-Racism Strategy Launched

There is a number of government departments that serve limited genuine useful purpose in making a worthwhile contribution to our society. The Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) is one of them.

Today the AHRC, an Australian Government agency, launched it's National Anti-Racism Strategy that will no doubt chew up millions of taxpayers money under control of a government that has racked up a deficit of staggering proportions.

After decades of governments imposing a multicultural society upon us, without our permission and thereby generating racial separation and division, they are now desperately trying to remediate the problems they have caused.

Until Muslims began immigrating to Australia from Lebanon in the Seventies, multiculturalism seemed to work reasonably well. Although enclaves sprung up with peoples from Greece, Lebanon, Asia etc, those immigrants integrated because we shared common values. Most Australians accepted and are accepting of the different races and ethnicities that have come to share this once great country with us.

Unfortunately, multiculturalism has also created increases in crime in some quarters and resentment in others and ill feelings towards some of the other races persists. I really don't know that it is as bad as some people suggest. I do know that I have been called a "white c*&t" on numerous occasions but I have never called anyone else by a racist name.

My view has always been that if a person is worthy of respect, I respect him/her. If people are not worthy of respect than I don't respect them, but I see no point in being nasty to them. I simply choose alternative company.

The term racism is so all-encompassing, it's probably true to say that we are all racist to some degree. Wouldn't you prefer to live in a street surrounded by people of your common race? I know I would. If I wanted to be surrounded by Somalis, I'd move to Somalia.

By definition, I am a racist. Would I hurt someone or treat them differently because they are of a different race? Definitely not.

What really galls me in the whole argument about racism and Australia is that the Australian Government and State and Territory Governments ALL have legislation and policies that are race based. They provide for a raft of services, grants and opportunities for people of Aboriginal race and exclude everyone else in Australia.

How can a government that perpetuates race-based legislation, policies and practices have the gall to implement a National Anti-Racism Strategy?

It beats me.

Dark Horse

I'm Back and Will Try to Stay

I hadn't realised how long it had been since I posted. I've been side-tracked with other things to do, a grandson to spend time with, and neglected this blog, which I commenced with good intentions.

Those good intentions included helping make people aware of what Islamists have in store for us. As I look about and see Iran trying to build nuclear arsenals with it's stated intention to rid the world of Israel and some of the most intelligent, productive, contributing people on our planet; as I see the numerous countries in financial crisis; the starving people in Africa; the wars we have running at present, it's very disheartening. Even the United Nations seems as though it is dead and waiting to be buried like it's predecessor, the League of Nations.

Although I do not lean easily towards conspiracy theories, it's easy for me to see how people imagine that there are Bilderberg groups and others out there trying to dictate the future of our planet. Collectively, we don't seem to be doing much to improve our lot while we certainly are doing a lot to destroy our societies.

To those of you who believe in a God, I say to you that the existence of he, she or it is most notable in it's absence.

I'll endeavour to post weekly and look forward to your commentary and input.

Dark Horse

Another Reason to Ban Muslim Immigration

While the government, in it's folly allows unbridled muslim immigration, there is so much evidence why it shouldn't. Do you think the government takes any notice? Of course not. It has its own agenda that may as well be to sell Australia off to muslims.

Not that muslims, per se, are the problem. Islam is the problem. Islam is a religion and a way of life that oppresses its adherents, doesn't respect the values or ideals of others, and has vowed to take over the world.

Here's the very latest in a long string of reasons why Australia should ban muslim immigration.

This fellow was a Pakistani who had immigrated to the United States and had citizenship of that country. No loyalty to the country that had accepted him, just hatred and willingness to kill what could have been hundreds of innocent people simply because they didn't follow his nonsensical beliefs.

Write to your local member now and tell him or her that you want muslim immigration to Australia banned. If you don't, within a few years you'll regret it.

Absolutely NO Sharia Law in Australia

First, muslims get their foot in the door. Then they start to request concessions that have to do with their values, customs and religion that are foreign to the host country. After a short while, as numbers of muslims increase, they start to demand and agitate for changes.

In Australia at present, the rot has started with a push to have small elements of Sharia made legal in Australia. Although they are only small changes, they would be contrary to existing Australian law.

Once they get a couple of changes in, then it will be the whole nonsensical Sharia.

We don't want muslim immigration and we don't want anyone who isn't willing to work within the Australian legal framework. Write to your local member of parliament and tell him or her that you will not accept Sharia law in Australia under any circumstances. Tell them also that you want Australia to stop muslim immigration.

Here's the article in the news paper.

How a Labor Government Handles Immigration

Paul Sheehan, in a very well written article in the Sydney Morning Herald sums up what the Rudd Labor Government is doing to destroy Australia.

Just the asylum seeker and immigration aspects of Labor policy and action are painful enough without reading the whole article, but if you have the stomach for it, I encourage you to click the link above and read the whole litany of stupidity that has or is occurring.

Here's two excerpts regarding asylum seekers and immigration:

"Asylum seekers. Unless the government can show otherwise, it appears that about 98 per cent of asylum-seekers are getting Australian residency. In contrast, the latest figures from the United Nations refugee agency show most asylum applications worldwide are rejected. The bulging Christmas Island detention centre has become a grossly expensive sham and a mockery of a core election promise.

Migration. Permanent migration to Australia surged 550,000 during the first two years of the Rudd government, the highest two-year increase in history. This is at odds with the government's rhetoric on reducing Australia's carbon footprint. It was also never mentioned before the election."

Add those to the rest of the failures Mr Sheehan mentions and it's clear that we have a government as destructive as the Whitlam Government. What I need to ask is why did you vote Labor, knowing that they incur massive debts, let the unions run rampant, bend at the knees on immigration issues, and couldn't manage a budget to save their lives?

I sure as hell didn't vote for them. Someone must have.

When they get the boot, the new Liberal Government will be back doing the hard yards again to keep the country going.

Robin

The Language of Separation

Reading a newspaper recently, I noticed an advertisement for a leadership program for "Aboriginal and non-aboriginal leaders". I wondered how different Aboriginal leaders were to perhaps Asian leaders, Caucasian or perhaps African leaders. Why was it necessary to make this difference?

It's this habitual and invariable use of labelling and classification that affects the national sub-conscious. It exacerbates the idea of them, descendents of First Australians and us, descendents of the other four races. If you must know what race I am to provide me with a service, instead of writing on your forms "Are you indigenous or non-indigenous?" why not "What is your race?"

While governments spend millions on so-called reconciliation programs, they defeat themselves (and the people) by perpetuating a system of entrenched apartheid ... racist programs for a small minority of our population; separate schools, birthing units, health centres, job programs etc.

As long as we continue to tell people they are special, different and disadvantaged, they will remain special, different and disadvantaged and never become equal with mainstream Australia. As Governor General Sir Paul Hasluck said perhaps 30 years ago, "We've homogenised the milk, but not the people."

We need to eradicate this language of separation, racist policies and laws and use inclusive language that demonstrates a united Australian. Who really gives a rat's if someone's ancestors 30,000 years ago lived on the plains of Mongolia when there is so much to do today?

Until we begin to treat all Australians as Australians and provide help to people based on need and not genes, Australia will remain a country of division struggling to free itself from its history. The first step is to use language of inclusion and unity instead of language of separation.