First, muslims get their foot in the door. Then they start to request concessions that have to do with their values, customs and religion that are foreign to the host country. After a short while, as numbers of muslims increase, they start to demand and agitate for changes.
In Australia at present, the rot has started with a push to have small elements of Sharia made legal in Australia. Although they are only small changes, they would be contrary to existing Australian law.
Once they get a couple of changes in, then it will be the whole nonsensical Sharia.
We don't want muslim immigration and we don't want anyone who isn't willing to work within the Australian legal framework. Write to your local member of parliament and tell him or her that you will not accept Sharia law in Australia under any circumstances. Tell them also that you want Australia to stop muslim immigration.
Here's the article in the news paper.
Showing posts with label muslim immigration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label muslim immigration. Show all posts
Monday, March 8, 2010
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Fearing for Freedom in a Post-Christian Europe
by David J. Rusin • Jan 31, 2010 at 11:06 pm
http://www.islamist-watch.org/
This is a precautionary message for Australia and muslim immigration.
Sometimes it seems that European Christian leaders are more concerned with preparing their flocks fordhimmitude than with defending their faith and the civilization built around it. Among other infamies, prominent clerics have maintained that the acceptance of Shari'a law is "unavoidable," urged believers to refer to God as "Allah," suggested that Lent be rebranded as "Christian Ramadan," and insisted that Catholic schools incorporate Muslim prayer rooms.
But not all are content to watch Christianity "go gentle into that good night" — and often they specify secular reasons. Michael Nazir-Ali, the former Anglican bishop of Rochester, has argued that many of the freedoms and institutions enjoyed in Europe have Christian roots — and thus are put at risk by sidelining Christianity. Likewise, he has hammered the UK's multicultural policies as unmitigated failures that serve only to undermine societal cohesion, even fostering Islamist-run "no-go areas" in major cities.
Two leading prelates recently have echoed Nazir-Ali. First, in an online interview, retiring Czech CardinalMiloslav Vlk asserts that the spiritual vacuum is being filled by Islam — especially its most radical elements — and could result in the "fall of Europe." Second, George Carey, the ex-archbishop of Canterbury, uses an op-ed to contend that "tolerance, fair play, [and] pluralism" are not enough to define a nation, "so we must look also to language, institutions, and our shared history." Unfortunately, "some groups of migrants … are ambivalent about or even hostile to such institutions" and prefer to self-segregate in "ghettos" governed by Shari'a.
Stating that "there must be a willingness on their part to integrate with the rest of British society," he continues:
Is there anything distinctly Christian about such a call? Some will say "no." Our values lie rather with the Enlightenment than with the Church. I believe that history is against them. It is my firm view that our society owes more to our Christian heritage than it realizes and to overlook this inheritance of faith will lead to the watering down of the very values of tolerance, openness, inclusion, and democracy that we claim are central to all we stand for.
What undergirds liberal democracy: the Enlightenment, Christianity, or some other factors? Furthermore, is the Islamic faith by nature compatible or incompatible with such a system? Detailed answers are beyond the scope of this blog, but please note that the Middle East Forum has worked to advance the debate on the latter question. What is absolutely undeniable, however, is that the Christian, Enlightenment-shaped West has produced the freest nations on the planet, while Muslim-majority states now rank among the lowest in terms of social and political rights.
Therefore, is it "Islamophobic" to worry about how Europe will be affected by the decline of Christianity, the ascent of anything-goes multiculturalism, and the expansion of unassimilated Muslim communities originating from oppressive lands? No. For lovers of freedom — believers and non-believers alike — these concerns are both reasonable and necessary.
Related Topics: Interfaith, Islamic Law (Shari'a), Multiculturalism, Segregation | David J. RusinThis text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.
Thursday, October 29, 2009
New Plan to Deal With Illegal Refugees
The idea of a multicultural Australia is one that few Australians accept. We accept immigrants, but we want them to become part of us ... to become Australians.
We don't mind if they start up a Chinese Restaurant or build a Greek Club so they can remember their homeland. Provided they integrate, learn our language and at least make an effort to fit in, we will accept them.
Our history of immigration is evidence of this.
It's probably true to say that most Australians (that is Australian born people) don't want dozens of people sailing in from overseas in old boats. Our illegal immigration policy has been a shambles. We need a new approach to dealing with illegal refugees.
One approach would be to establish Refugee Processing Offices in the countries from which most of our refugees are now coming. Instead of having to save up $15,000 to pay some Indonesian for a trip across the Indian Ocean in an endeavour to reach our mainland, they could lodge their applications at one of our Refugee Offices, completely free of charge.
This would demonstrate our generosity, humanity and willingness to grasp cultural and language diverse peoples.
Muslims, criminals and anyone found undesirable for political or other reasons would be prohibited entry and have their application refused. Economic refugees would also be refused. Having an office in the countries of refugees' origins it would be easier to check such things as birth certificate, whether they were generally victimised and so on. Medical examinations could be carried out to ensure no unwanted diseases eg, tuberculosis, weren't imported to Australia.
Those who passed the test for genuine refugee, could be paid to fly to Australia, given a Medicare card, a cheap government apartment, set up with Centrelink payments for life, and spend the rest of their days living at tax-payer expense.
They would be so grateful, that as soon as they were eligible, they could be signed up as members of the Labor Party and have a real opportunity of getting a cushy job as a politician in an ethnic electorate, representing the diversity of thier electorate.
Eventually, when enough of them got into politics, they could use the great democratic system to change laws to allow millions of uneducated, poor, refugees into the country thus showing everyone what a great country we have.
As the rivers died off, the productivity of farms and orchards decreased and people began to become hungry, thirsty and felt victimised, they could get into boats and travel back to countries from which they came which now have new people, fresh crops, a sound government and democratic systems since they had time to replenish and redevelop without all the dead wood being there.
This is what is called the cycle of life.
If you believe Australia should have offices in high refugee intake countries, write to your local member today and request it. You never know, you could finish up in a seaside office with your computer drinking pina colados and processing the odd refugee application.
We don't mind if they start up a Chinese Restaurant or build a Greek Club so they can remember their homeland. Provided they integrate, learn our language and at least make an effort to fit in, we will accept them.
Our history of immigration is evidence of this.
It's probably true to say that most Australians (that is Australian born people) don't want dozens of people sailing in from overseas in old boats. Our illegal immigration policy has been a shambles. We need a new approach to dealing with illegal refugees.
One approach would be to establish Refugee Processing Offices in the countries from which most of our refugees are now coming. Instead of having to save up $15,000 to pay some Indonesian for a trip across the Indian Ocean in an endeavour to reach our mainland, they could lodge their applications at one of our Refugee Offices, completely free of charge.
This would demonstrate our generosity, humanity and willingness to grasp cultural and language diverse peoples.
Muslims, criminals and anyone found undesirable for political or other reasons would be prohibited entry and have their application refused. Economic refugees would also be refused. Having an office in the countries of refugees' origins it would be easier to check such things as birth certificate, whether they were generally victimised and so on. Medical examinations could be carried out to ensure no unwanted diseases eg, tuberculosis, weren't imported to Australia.
Those who passed the test for genuine refugee, could be paid to fly to Australia, given a Medicare card, a cheap government apartment, set up with Centrelink payments for life, and spend the rest of their days living at tax-payer expense.
They would be so grateful, that as soon as they were eligible, they could be signed up as members of the Labor Party and have a real opportunity of getting a cushy job as a politician in an ethnic electorate, representing the diversity of thier electorate.
Eventually, when enough of them got into politics, they could use the great democratic system to change laws to allow millions of uneducated, poor, refugees into the country thus showing everyone what a great country we have.
As the rivers died off, the productivity of farms and orchards decreased and people began to become hungry, thirsty and felt victimised, they could get into boats and travel back to countries from which they came which now have new people, fresh crops, a sound government and democratic systems since they had time to replenish and redevelop without all the dead wood being there.
This is what is called the cycle of life.
If you believe Australia should have offices in high refugee intake countries, write to your local member today and request it. You never know, you could finish up in a seaside office with your computer drinking pina colados and processing the odd refugee application.
Monday, September 14, 2009
Not a Racial Riot, a Religious Riot
According to an article in News.com.au titled, "Facebook Used to Organise Riot - Police":
"A RIOT by Muslim youths in the western Sydney suburb of Auburn last week was organised via Facebook, police believe.
The troublemakers used the social networking site to flash up inflammatory references to police and rally their friends for a confrontation.
One update identified police as "non-believers" who were raiding a "brother's home".
More than 150 people gathered in Cumberland Road, Auburn, on Tuesday night, forcing police to call in 100 officers, the riot squad and a helicopter.
The tense stand-off came after Middle Eastern organised crime squad police raided four homes."
The idea that this riot was racially based is a ruse to downplay the fact that muslims were at its centre. Most Arabs are Caucasians like most Australians. They have darker skin, usually brown eyes and black hair, but they are never the less, Caucasian.
This was a religious-based riot. Muslims against everyone else. They are a group that doesn't readily tolerate anyone whose views are different.
Their views are almost totally different from those of us who are real Australians. There is evidence all over the world that muslims are intolerant of non-muslims.
The question I have to ask again is why are we letting them immigrate to Australia? We know that these people create problems wherever they go. In the same way that they are now creating problems in Australia. We don't need them. The more we allow into the country, the more frequently our problems will occur and eventually they will resort to armed insurrection to establish an Islamic State within Australia.
I do not hate these people and I would do nothing intentionally to hurt them. In fact I have several good friends who are muslims. However, I believe they should move to an Islamic Utopia like Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia or some other place where their values and religion will provide what they need.
They are not wanted and not needed in Australia. Write to your local member and ask that muslims be banned from permanent immigration to Australia. If you don't, we will all live to regret it.
"A RIOT by Muslim youths in the western Sydney suburb of Auburn last week was organised via Facebook, police believe.
The troublemakers used the social networking site to flash up inflammatory references to police and rally their friends for a confrontation.
One update identified police as "non-believers" who were raiding a "brother's home".
More than 150 people gathered in Cumberland Road, Auburn, on Tuesday night, forcing police to call in 100 officers, the riot squad and a helicopter.
The tense stand-off came after Middle Eastern organised crime squad police raided four homes."
The idea that this riot was racially based is a ruse to downplay the fact that muslims were at its centre. Most Arabs are Caucasians like most Australians. They have darker skin, usually brown eyes and black hair, but they are never the less, Caucasian.
This was a religious-based riot. Muslims against everyone else. They are a group that doesn't readily tolerate anyone whose views are different.
Their views are almost totally different from those of us who are real Australians. There is evidence all over the world that muslims are intolerant of non-muslims.
The question I have to ask again is why are we letting them immigrate to Australia? We know that these people create problems wherever they go. In the same way that they are now creating problems in Australia. We don't need them. The more we allow into the country, the more frequently our problems will occur and eventually they will resort to armed insurrection to establish an Islamic State within Australia.
I do not hate these people and I would do nothing intentionally to hurt them. In fact I have several good friends who are muslims. However, I believe they should move to an Islamic Utopia like Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia or some other place where their values and religion will provide what they need.
They are not wanted and not needed in Australia. Write to your local member and ask that muslims be banned from permanent immigration to Australia. If you don't, we will all live to regret it.
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Introducing Wake Up Australia!
On the eve when Australian news media are full of reports about Middle Eastern people attempting to illegally enter Australia on some cock-and-bull story about being refugees, Australians need a Wake Up call.
This blog has these intentions:
This blog has these intentions:
- To get the Australian Government to revoke its agreement to the United Nations Declaration Regarding the Rights of Refugees and UN Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief
- To critically discuss other issues affecting Australian society
The first point covers issues that cause the Australian Government to have lost control of illegal immigrants (boat people) and to be unable to restrict immigration to people whose religion and values are incompatible with ours.
There are good reasons why Australia should prevent further muslim immigration and the second Declaration removes the power for the Australian Government to do that.
In effect, we have lost control of our own country and our right to make decisions suitable for the national good of Australia.
But don't be misled, this blog is NOT intended to be an anti-race, ethnic or religion rant, nor is it intended to incite violence or hatred against anyone or to break any laws relating to discrimination etc. It is intended to elicit thouthful debate about the key issues affecting and likely to affect Australia in the next 30 years so that we can lobby politicians and others to run the country the way we, the voters, want.
Thoughtful commentary, with supporting evidence is preferred.
Anyone is welcome to post, but posts that are offensive (as opposed to critical comment) or which the blog owner believes are unsuitable, will be deleted.
Are you willing to help Save Australia?
Editor
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
