Absolutely NO Sharia Law in Australia

First, muslims get their foot in the door. Then they start to request concessions that have to do with their values, customs and religion that are foreign to the host country. After a short while, as numbers of muslims increase, they start to demand and agitate for changes.

In Australia at present, the rot has started with a push to have small elements of Sharia made legal in Australia. Although they are only small changes, they would be contrary to existing Australian law.

Once they get a couple of changes in, then it will be the whole nonsensical Sharia.

We don't want muslim immigration and we don't want anyone who isn't willing to work within the Australian legal framework. Write to your local member of parliament and tell him or her that you will not accept Sharia law in Australia under any circumstances. Tell them also that you want Australia to stop muslim immigration.

Here's the article in the news paper.

How a Labor Government Handles Immigration

Paul Sheehan, in a very well written article in the Sydney Morning Herald sums up what the Rudd Labor Government is doing to destroy Australia.

Just the asylum seeker and immigration aspects of Labor policy and action are painful enough without reading the whole article, but if you have the stomach for it, I encourage you to click the link above and read the whole litany of stupidity that has or is occurring.

Here's two excerpts regarding asylum seekers and immigration:

"Asylum seekers. Unless the government can show otherwise, it appears that about 98 per cent of asylum-seekers are getting Australian residency. In contrast, the latest figures from the United Nations refugee agency show most asylum applications worldwide are rejected. The bulging Christmas Island detention centre has become a grossly expensive sham and a mockery of a core election promise.

Migration. Permanent migration to Australia surged 550,000 during the first two years of the Rudd government, the highest two-year increase in history. This is at odds with the government's rhetoric on reducing Australia's carbon footprint. It was also never mentioned before the election."

Add those to the rest of the failures Mr Sheehan mentions and it's clear that we have a government as destructive as the Whitlam Government. What I need to ask is why did you vote Labor, knowing that they incur massive debts, let the unions run rampant, bend at the knees on immigration issues, and couldn't manage a budget to save their lives?

I sure as hell didn't vote for them. Someone must have.

When they get the boot, the new Liberal Government will be back doing the hard yards again to keep the country going.

Robin

The Language of Separation

Reading a newspaper recently, I noticed an advertisement for a leadership program for "Aboriginal and non-aboriginal leaders". I wondered how different Aboriginal leaders were to perhaps Asian leaders, Caucasian or perhaps African leaders. Why was it necessary to make this difference?

It's this habitual and invariable use of labelling and classification that affects the national sub-conscious. It exacerbates the idea of them, descendents of First Australians and us, descendents of the other four races. If you must know what race I am to provide me with a service, instead of writing on your forms "Are you indigenous or non-indigenous?" why not "What is your race?"

While governments spend millions on so-called reconciliation programs, they defeat themselves (and the people) by perpetuating a system of entrenched apartheid ... racist programs for a small minority of our population; separate schools, birthing units, health centres, job programs etc.

As long as we continue to tell people they are special, different and disadvantaged, they will remain special, different and disadvantaged and never become equal with mainstream Australia. As Governor General Sir Paul Hasluck said perhaps 30 years ago, "We've homogenised the milk, but not the people."

We need to eradicate this language of separation, racist policies and laws and use inclusive language that demonstrates a united Australian. Who really gives a rat's if someone's ancestors 30,000 years ago lived on the plains of Mongolia when there is so much to do today?

Until we begin to treat all Australians as Australians and provide help to people based on need and not genes, Australia will remain a country of division struggling to free itself from its history. The first step is to use language of inclusion and unity instead of language of separation.

Fearing for Freedom in a Post-Christian Europe

by David J. Rusin • Jan 31, 2010 at 11:06 pm

http://www.islamist-watch.org/blog/2010/01/fearing-for-freedom-in-a-post-christian-europe

This is a precautionary message for Australia and muslim immigration.

Sometimes it seems that European Christian leaders are more concerned with preparing their flocks fordhimmitude than with defending their faith and the civilization built around it. Among other infamies, prominent clerics have maintained that the acceptance of Shari'a law is "unavoidable," urged believers to refer to God as "Allah," suggested that Lent be rebranded as "Christian Ramadan," and insisted that Catholic schools incorporate Muslim prayer rooms.

But not all are content to watch Christianity "go gentle into that good night" — and often they specify secular reasons. Michael Nazir-Ali, the former Anglican bishop of Rochester, has argued that many of the freedoms and institutions enjoyed in Europe have Christian roots — and thus are put at risk by sidelining Christianity. Likewise, he has hammered the UK's multicultural policies as unmitigated failures that serve only to undermine societal cohesion, even fostering Islamist-run "no-go areas" in major cities.

Two leading prelates recently have echoed Nazir-Ali. First, in an online interview, retiring Czech CardinalMiloslav Vlk asserts that the spiritual vacuum is being filled by Islam — especially its most radical elements — and could result in the "fall of Europe." Second, George Carey, the ex-archbishop of Canterbury, uses an op-ed to contend that "tolerance, fair play, [and] pluralism" are not enough to define a nation, "so we must look also to language, institutions, and our shared history." Unfortunately, "some groups of migrants … are ambivalent about or even hostile to such institutions" and prefer to self-segregate in "ghettos" governed by Shari'a.

Stating that "there must be a willingness on their part to integrate with the rest of British society," he continues:

Is there anything distinctly Christian about such a call? Some will say "no." Our values lie rather with the Enlightenment than with the Church. I believe that history is against them. It is my firm view that our society owes more to our Christian heritage than it realizes and to overlook this inheritance of faith will lead to the watering down of the very values of tolerance, openness, inclusion, and democracy that we claim are central to all we stand for.

What undergirds liberal democracy: the Enlightenment, Christianity, or some other factors? Furthermore, is the Islamic faith by nature compatible or incompatible with such a system? Detailed answers are beyond the scope of this blog, but please note that the Middle East Forum has worked to advance the debate on the latter question. What is absolutely undeniable, however, is that the Christian, Enlightenment-shaped West has produced the freest nations on the planet, while Muslim-majority states now rank among the lowest in terms of social and political rights.

Therefore, is it "Islamophobic" to worry about how Europe will be affected by the decline of Christianity, the ascent of anything-goes multiculturalism, and the expansion of unassimilated Muslim communities originating from oppressive lands? No. For lovers of freedom — believers and non-believers alike — these concerns are both reasonable and necessary.

Related Topics: Interfaith, Islamic Law (Shari'a), Multiculturalism, Segregation | David J. RusinThis text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.

Your 2010 New Year Resolution

You don't need to live a life controlled and manipulated by religion. You don't need to:

1. Feel a sense of guilt because you believe in original sin
2. Be frightened of eternal damnation
3. Have your fertility controlled by a church
4. Fear punishment because you don't believe religious fairy tales
5. Cover your face and body so that nobody can see the real you
6. Face punishment or death because you talked to men or had an "improper" liaison
7. Believe religious myth because others do (you aren't a sheep are you?)
8. Do anything else you don't want to to follow some man-made doctrine passed off as divine
9. Brain wash your children into following a religion (a type of child abuse(

You can live a good, happy life without religion. Religion is a cause of much evil and unnecessary suffering in the world and has been for thousands of years.

Make 2010 the year you free your life of religion and live the life you should. Join the increasing band of people who have seen the light.

Dark Horse

Government Buckles To Tamil Refugees' Demands

In one of the most gutless backdowns I have ever seen by the Australian Government, 78 Tamil malcontents from Sri Lank will be granted permanent residence visas.

This makes me incredibly angry. The government has betrayed the Australian people. Those of us who pay taxes to support immigrants and hundreds of thousands of other people who rely on the welfare system. We, who vote for governments we think will carry out our wishes.

What kind of government allows a group of people to hold it to ransom? A spineless government ... the Australian Labor Government.

The 78 Tamils have lived in Indonesia for months. They paid up to $15,000 USD for a boat trip to Australia so they could enter our country illegally. When the boat sank, the Australian Government's Customs vessel "Oceanic Viking" rescued them at great expense to the Australian taxpayers. After being decent enough to rescue them, they then refused to leave the vessel and return to Indonesia. We fed them and provided medical attention for the past four weeks and rather than force them off (which would have made the government look bad), or take them back to Sri Lanka, where their own Prime Minister said they are economic refugees, not asylum seekers, the Labor Government will give them permanent residence visas.

They'll receive Centrelink benefits, Medicare Card, and assistance we don't even give our own people, many of whom will have paid tax for decades. Some of whom are pensioners struggling to get by from week to week.

The Australian Government stinks. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd stinks. Gutless. Spineless.

We need to win back our country. We need Referenda to determine some of the critical issues facing Australian society. Such as:

1. Whether we should ban muslim immigration and try to offload those muslims who are already here (pay them to leave)
2. The need for a Human Rights Act
3. Whether we should cease our alignment with the United Nations Convention on Refugees
4. Means testing of all government benefits, especially those given to descendants of the First Australians

Please write to your local Member of Parliament (check the phone book) and object to the backdown by government in relation to the Sri Lankan illegal immigrants.

The longer we fail to do something, the worse it will get.

New Plan to Deal With Illegal Refugees

The idea of a multicultural Australia is one that few Australians accept. We accept immigrants, but we want them to become part of us ... to become Australians.

We don't mind if they start up a Chinese Restaurant or build a Greek Club so they can remember their homeland. Provided they integrate, learn our language and at least make an effort to fit in, we will accept them.

Our history of immigration is evidence of this.
It's probably true to say that most Australians (that is Australian born people) don't want dozens of people sailing in from overseas in old boats. Our illegal immigration policy has been a shambles. We need a new approach to dealing with illegal refugees.

One approach would be to establish Refugee Processing Offices in the countries from which most of our refugees are now coming. Instead of having to save up $15,000 to pay some Indonesian for a trip across the Indian Ocean in an endeavour to reach our mainland, they could lodge their applications at one of our Refugee Offices, completely free of charge.

This would demonstrate our generosity, humanity and willingness to grasp cultural and language diverse peoples.

Muslims, criminals and anyone found undesirable for political or other reasons would be prohibited entry and have their application refused. Economic refugees would also be refused. Having an office in the countries of refugees' origins it would be easier to check such things as birth certificate, whether they were generally victimised and so on. Medical examinations could be carried out to ensure no unwanted diseases eg, tuberculosis, weren't imported to Australia.

Those who passed the test for genuine refugee, could be paid to fly to Australia, given a Medicare card, a cheap government apartment, set up with Centrelink payments for life, and spend the rest of their days living at tax-payer expense.

They would be so grateful, that as soon as they were eligible, they could be signed up as members of the Labor Party and have a real opportunity of getting a cushy job as a politician in an ethnic electorate, representing the diversity of thier electorate.

Eventually, when enough of them got into politics, they could use the great democratic system to change laws to allow millions of uneducated, poor, refugees into the country thus showing everyone what a great country we have.

As the rivers died off, the productivity of farms and orchards decreased and people began to become hungry, thirsty and felt victimised, they could get into boats and travel back to countries from which they came which now have new people, fresh crops, a sound government and democratic systems since they had time to replenish and redevelop without all the dead wood being there.

This is what is called the cycle of life.

If you believe Australia should have offices in high refugee intake countries, write to your local member today and request it. You never know, you could finish up in a seaside office with your computer drinking pina colados and processing the odd refugee application.